Finn and Jake come by a city they’ve never been to before, and a Hag appears to warn them that this is the City of Thieves. If you set foot in the city, it will eventually get to you and turn you into a thief. Finn spots a little girl, named Penny, outside the city crying because some thieves stole her basket. Finn offers to get it back for her, confident that the city won’t be able to corrupt him.
When they enter the city, getting Penny’s basket back proves to be more difficult than they had thought, as the basket keeps getting stolen again and again. Penny tells Finn about the king thief who steals from people and brings all of it to his tower, which is protected by a barrier that you can only get through if you’re not a thief. This makes me wonder how the king thief is able to get inside his own tower. Does the barrier keep out all thieves except for himself? Anyway, they decide to check inside the tower to see if Penny’s basket may have ended up there, but Jake can’t enter the tower because the city got to him and he couldn’t resist stealing something, so Finn has to go in by himself. When he enters the tower, he finds that the king thief must have died long ago, since he’s now just a skeleton. The chest where he keeps all of his stolen goods are hidden in the skeleton’s chest. Get it? It’s punny. But how did the king thief put the chest in his chest before he died? And how would the basket end up in there if the king thief is dead? Finn doesn’t think of these questions, he just grabs the chest and goes back outside to meet Penny and Jake.
When Finn reaches them, Penny grabs the chest (which is filled with jewels) from him and reveals that she tricked him into getting the chest for her. She couldn’t enter the tower herself because she’s a thief. Plot twist! Except not really because I saw it coming from the moment we met Penny. It’s still a pretty cool twist though, and really clever of Penny. That little girl is going places. Even better is the fact that Finn can’t even return the chest, which he immediately tries to do after finding out about Penny’s plan. Finn can’t enter the tower anymore. He stole the chest, and that makes him a thief, so he can’t pass the barrier. Ha! It probably seems weird for me to be enjoying Finn being tricked this much, but Penny’s trick was just so clever, and I’ve always loved sly, cunning characters like Penny.
Penny runs off with the chest, and Finn is traumatized that his purity has been corrupted. Has it, though? Finn’s overreaction to this is mostly played for laughs, but of course I can’t help over-analyzing things. Finn didn’t steal the chest with corrupt motives. He wasn’t stealing it for himself, he was stealing it to help someone else (it’s kind of reminiscent of Robin Hood, actually). His intentions were good, pure and selfless, so is he really corrupted? Of course, intent doesn’t erase effect. Just because someone’s intentions are good it doesn’t mean that what they’re doing is acceptable. I don’t even know where I’m going with this train of thought anymore. Why do I always over-think everything in this show?!
Anyway, after having a meltdown about how he’s been corrupted, Finn decides to embrace his “dark side” and vows to get revenge on Penny. He and Jake begin stealing objects from around the city and find Penny’s tent. Well. I guess Finn is corrupted. They confront Penny in her tent and use a bar of soap they stole to wash her clean, which apparently makes her “clean” on the inside as well, and she no longer wants to be a thief. So, Finn isn’t corrupted? He didn’t get revenge on Penny, he rehabilitated her, and the soap apparently worked on him and Jake as well, so was he corrupted or not? But wait, the episode ends with Penny stealing Finn’s clothes and running away again, so she wasn’t actually rehabilitated. What.
Okay, it’s a little strange, but I actually really like the ending of this episode. I like that Penny hasn’t changed (because really, a bath being the answer to rehabilitation sounds like the stupidest plot device ever and I’m glad they didn’t go that route), and that Finn hasn’t changed either, despite his fears. One bad choice doesn’t automatically make you a bad person, Finn was overreacting to being “corrupted” and I think this ending is supposed to reflect that.
I like how everyone is effected by the city in different ways. Finn was determined to hang on to his purity and to not let the city corrupt him. Even after it seemed like his purity was threatened, his desire to do good was strong enough to beat out his “dark side”. He realized that he still had a choice in the matter. Jake is benevolent, but he doesn’t quite have Finn’s conviction to doing good. He was more susceptible to the city’s influence because, ultimately, he has more self-interest than Finn. Essentially, Jake is a True Neutral while Finn is more of a Lawful Good. Penny seems like a Neutral Evil. She is either unable or unwilling to fight the city’s influence. She does whatever is best for herself and doesn’t care about who she hurts in the process. She has no qualms about tricking Finn, but it isn’t until he confronts her in her tent and threatens her that she outright attacks him (“I’m sorry, Finn. Let me give you some uh, gems, or some gold, or uh, have some [pulls out knife] knife in your neck!”). The city has varying degrees of influence on all three characters because of their chosen philosophies
Of course, Penny seems to have spent more time in the city and might even have been born there, so this could also have influenced her. I wonder what would happen if someone who was in the city for a long time left and never went back. Would they still be a thief? Would fighting the urge to steal get easier? Would they eventually lose the urge completely? And does your age upon entering the city make any difference? Penny is really young and seems to have grown up in the city. She would never have known anything different, so is it more difficult to leave that lifestyle behind?
I really do read too much into these episodes, don’t I? At least I haven’t started sorting characters into Hogwarts houses yet.
Whatever, it’s fun to think about these things.
Rating: 9/10
Finn and Jake stumble upon a garden filled with pastries growing on bushes. The witch who owns the garden appears and accuses Jake of eating one of her doughnuts. Jake denies that he did, but he’s eating one of the doughnuts as he’s saying it (funny how both this episode and City of Thieves have Jake steal something without realizing it). As punishment, she takes away Jake’s powers. And for some reason this makes him look like a chubby man in underwear from the neck down? Um, okay then. The witch refuses to give Jake his powers back (and return him to his normal appearance) until he apologizes to her, but Jake is too stubborn and too prideful to do so.
Finn and Jake return to their tree fort and try to figure out another way for Jake to get his powers back. Finn asks Jake how he got his powers to begin with, and Jake explains that one day, back when he was a puppy, he was rolling in a mud puddle and I guess the mud was magical because he’s had powers since then. I… I thought Jake was born with his powers? If dogs in this world are born with the ability to speak, why can’t they also be born with shape-shifting powers? It makes more sense than getting powers from a mud puddle. Is this supposed to be a joke about the cliche of super heroes getting their powers from radioactive waste? Well, anyway, Finn suggests that they roll in mud puddles all around the Land of Ooo until they find one that gives Jake his powers back.
The problem is, Jake has been relying on his powers for so long that he’s gotten extremely lazy without them, more so than ever. He can’t even bother to try that hard to get them back, which frustrates Finn. During their quest to find every mud puddle in the Land of Ooo (how), they encounter a mermaid. At least, she calls herself a mermaid. Her design is pretty cool, but she’s definitely no Ariel. Anyway, she attacks Finn, knocks him out, and takes him to her nest, where she leaves him as food for her hatchlings. Pretty sure that’s not a mermaid thing. Jake tries to rescue Finn, but he’s useless without his powers.
Left with no other options, Jake is forced to go back to the witch’s garden and apologize to her. The witch is annoyed that Jake took so long to apologize, so she forces him to do humiliating tasks before giving him back his powers. Once she thinks Jake has learned his lesson, she gives him his powers back and he immediately knocks over her cane, steals another one of her donuts, and leaves the garden before she can retaliate. So he learned nothing. When he rescues Finn, he tells Finn that he found the right mud puddle. So he really learned nothing.
I think this episode is supposed to have a moral, but I don’t know what it’s supposed to be. Actually, I think they were trying to do one of those things where the moral should be obvious but the “wacky” characters miss the point completely. Except I still don’t know what the moral they missed even is.
I’ve talked and joked about how weird this show is many times, but no matter how weird things got I can’t recall not understanding any of the episodes I’ve seen so far. I may have joked about how confused I was, but, well, those were jokes, I never really meant it. This show is incredibly weird but it’s not hard to follow each episode’s story and understand its purpose.
That said, I don’t get The Witch’s Garden. I… I just don’t get it. I don’t even know what to say about it because I’m not entirely sure what I watched. The story’s actually simpler than most episodes, but I don’t understand its purpose.
I guess not every episode needs a purpose, they just need to be entertaining, but what bothers me is I think this episode is supposed to have a purpose and I don’t know what that purpose is.
What am I supposed to take away from this? What have I learned about Jake? What was Jake supposed to have learned? I really don’t know.
Rating: 5/10